This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: bfd/elf/mn10300 "dangerous error"

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:

> What I meant, was, if our target has its own "style" of shared
> libraries, more specific than the generic shared library support BFD
> offers, can it tell the BFD that it needs this more specific format?
> Or would that be a new BFD, derived from the generic one, a new
> emulation, or just a command line option?
> 
> That way, we could differentiate (for example) uClinux-style PIC from
> MMU-ful Linux style PIC.

If the target supports two different kinds of shared libraries, then I
think two different targets would be appropriate.

> (it's issues like this that make me wish bfd was implemented in C++.
> Virtual functions for these handlers would be *so* nice)

Yes.

Ian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]