This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 01:38:04PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > not sure if I told you, but your implementation of x86-64 lcommon seems > to work flawlessly for me now, so it would be very nice if you pushed it > into mainline binutils tree ;) > > Thanks a lot for help! > Honza There are 2 patches for x86_64 large data section support. They have been tested on x86_64, ia32 and ia64. There are no regressions. Other backends can use the frame work provided here to improve large/small common symbol support if needed. Are there any objections to check them in? H.J.
Attachment:
bfd-common-7.patch
Description: Text document
Attachment:
binutils-x86_64-large-15.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |