This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

segfault in bfd with large static binary


i was building statically the latest busybox binary on amd64 and when i went 
to strip it, strip segfaulted on me

normally i use binutils 2.16.1, but i found 2.16.91.0.5 and the 060131 
snapshot bombed out the same way

i'd attach the binary but it's about 2megs :)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/busybox

i got others to verify various Gentoo systems, but i dont have any 
Debian/Fedora amd64 chroots around so can someone else check to make sure 
this isnt just a screw up on my end ?  just running `strip busybox` would 
segfault in libbfd.so _bfd_elf_compute_section_file_positions() ...
-mike


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]