This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: segfault in bfd with large static binary

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 21:47:32 -0500
Subject: Re: segfault in bfd with large static binary
References: <200601312314.51054.vapier@gentoo.org> <200602012103.04659.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060202024402.GA1840@lucon.org>

On Wednesday 01 February 2006 21:44, H. J. Lu wrote:
> I don't think
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00016.html
>
> is correct. That part of code is for linker only. strip/objcopy should
> never reach it. The bug is elsewhere.

with that patch by Nick, `strip` didnt segfault ...
-mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: segfault in bfd with large static binary
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- segfault in bfd with large static binary
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: segfault in bfd with large static binary
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: segfault in bfd with large static binary
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]