This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [patch] Arguments of GTY
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:14:55AM +0900, Masaki Muranaka wrote:
>
> On 2006/05/07, at 5:41, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >It sounds like you are trying to mix and match the include/ headers
> >from binutils with an older GCC source tree. Is that right?
>
> Yes.
>
> >Don't do it. GCC has its own copy of these headers and should be
> >built
> >using its own copy.
>
> Then, why does it still have GTY?
The files are kept synchronized in the development HEAD. If you're
using HEAD, you can generally combine the two directories, but you're
using two different versions from several years apart.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery