Re: Test suite results for mips-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)

[Thiemo Seufer <ths at networkno dot de>]

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Test Run By tbm on Wed May 17 20:54:24 2006
> Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
> 
> 		=== binutils tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> 		=== binutils Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		35
> 
> 		=== gas tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> 		=== gas Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		581
> # of expected failures		1
> 
> 		=== ld tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> FAIL: vers24a [?]
> FAIL: vers24b [?]
> FAIL: vers24c [?]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset) [see below]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) [*]
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main) [*]
> FAIL: MIPS textrel-1 [see below]
> FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 3 [*]
> 
> 		=== ld Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		281
> # of unexpected failures	15
> # of expected failures		20
> # of unsupported tests		1
> 
> [*] Thiemo pointed out to me that these fail with a segfault or a bus
> error and that he cannot reproduce them when running the tests by hand.
> He'll test on other hardware later.

SIGILL, actually.

> [?] I cannot see an error message.

The expected relocation entry isn't there.

[snip]
> Running /home/tbm/tmp/src/binutils-2.16.93/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp ...
> failed with: <tmpdir/dump0.o: In function `start':
> (.text+0x10): relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_26 against `start'>, expected: <.*relocation truncated to fit.*>
> FAIL: MIPS textrel-1

I don't see the last one, textrel-1 creates a TEXTREL section here but
shouldn't.


Thiemo