This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: on sparc-linux: FAIL: ld-elf/loadaddr2
- From: "Christian Joensson" <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:13:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: on sparc-linux: FAIL: ld-elf/loadaddr2
- References: <5460e3330608210019kbac3b7ev2ca73f92edbc87e7@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/21/06, Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com> wrote:
I just tried binutils daily snapshot, 20060821, and found a new
testsuite failure, not present on the 20060818 snapshot, siince it was
added 20060818... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-06/msg00792.html
bah, a mixup, it should have been
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-08/msg00093.html
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/../gas/as-new -o
tmpdir/dump0.o /usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/loadaddr.s
./ld-new -L/usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -T
loadaddr2.t -z max-page-size=0x200000 -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/../binutils/readelf -l
--wide tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ LOAD +0x302000 0xf*80302000 0xf*80302000 0x0*1 0x0*1 RW 0x200000$"
line " LOAD 0x302000 0x80302000 0x802f3000 0x00001
0x00001 RW 0x200000"
FAIL: ld-elf/loadaddr2
Any ideas of what is wrong?
Would you like me to provide more informaton?
--
Cheers,
/ChJ