Re: [PATCH] fix underfined Thumb symbols (try 2)

[Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>]

On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 10:07, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> some time ago I sent a patch that stops binutils from settings low bit of ARM 
> Thumb external symbols, see:
> 
>    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-06/msg00273.html
> 
> That patch was approved and committed, but after that I've discovered that
> the patch had one line wrong, so new code had no effect, and the new test just 
> failed.
> 
> I'm not sure how that happened, for I see the test pass locally, maybe it was 
> some merge glitch. I apologise, and send a followup patch that sets 
> everything right. I've verified that mainline builds with this patch and that 
> the test in question now passes, and that there are no regressions.
> 
> I've no write access; if approved I'd also appreciate committing this patch 
> for me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Volodya
> 
> bfd/
> 2006-09-04  Vladimir Prus  <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> 
>         * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_swap_symbol_out): Remove
>         unconditional setting of low bit for Thumb symbol
>         mistakenly left behind after check for external
>         symbols was added.
> 
> ld/testsuite/
> 
> 2006-09-04  Vladimir Prus  <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
>         * ld-arm/use-thumb-lib.sym: Use regexps instead of
>         absolute addresses, for robustness.

This is ok, but can you correct the spelling mistake in the comment that
precedes this: it's "undefined" not "underfined" (no 'r').

R.