Re: patch for fixing illegal instruction (wldrb, wldrh, wstrb, wstrh)

["Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>]

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Bridge Wu wrote:

> I mean it is FAILing with the code patch applied. The diff between old
> and new sum file is as below.
> 
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Thumb shared library with ARM entry points
> ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Mixed ARM/Thumb shared library
> ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Using Thumb lib by another lib
> +./gas/testsuite/gas.sum:FAIL: Intel(r) Wireless MMX(tm) technology
> instructions version 1
> ./gas/testsuite/gas.sum:FAIL: Neon optional register operands
> 
> 
> I saw only one expect file (arm.exp) existed in gas/testsuite/gas/arm
> folder which also contained my testcase. From arm.exp shown as below,
> the new test should be run according .d file. I suspect my .d file is
> not written well. Or something else wrong?

You will need to examine the gas.log file to determine what commands were 
run with what options, whether those were the options intended, what 
output was produced and what regular expression is not being matched.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com