This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Remove --with-bugurl in gas, ld, gprof and binutils


On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:15:54PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, H. J. Lu wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:09:35AM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > There is only one --with-pkgversion in bfd. But we have
> > > --with-bugurl in bfd, gas, ld, gprof and binutils. Is this
> > > really necessary? Can't we have just one in bfd, like
> > > --with-pkgversion?
> > > 
> > 
> > This patch removes --with-bugurl in gas, ld, gprof and binutils.
> 
> I have a patch pending review 
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-03/msg00027.html> to make 
> --with-bugurl apply to the manuals.  Could you make your patch relative to 
> a tree with my patch applied, or wait for my patch to be reviewed and then 
> prepare a new patch that takes account of using this information in the 
> manuals?  The manuals don't presently have a common include file from BFD 
> the way the C source does - but you could create one.
> 

How do you handle PKGVERSION in manuals? I think --with-bugurl
and --with-pkgversion should be handled in the same fashion.



H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]