This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ demangling of 64-bit symbols on ppc64


Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com> writes:



As the de facto maintainer of the ppc64 bits of oprofile, I was
recently asked to look into an oprofile bug where it was incorrectly
demangling 64-bit symbols.  The oprofile code uses the libiberty
function, cplus_demangle(), but is not getting back the right answer
for ppc64 64-bit symbols.  This appears to be more fallout from the
change (made a couple years ago or so) to the opd for ppc64, where the
leading "." was removed from 64-bit symbols.

I hacked around the problem in my private oprofile src tree, but I'm
thinking this issue should be solved at its source. I'm seeing this
problem on a SLES 10 system with binutils version 2.16.91. Has this
possibly been resolved in a more recent binutils version or in CVS?



Can you give an example of a symbol which the demangler is not
handling correctly?


Below is the testcase provided to me by the person who reported it:

==========

void doit(char *str)
{
       while (1)
               ;
}

char *blah;
int main()
{
       doit(blah);
}

When built as 32bit:

# g++ -O2 test.c -o test

opreport -l gives:

42345 89.6627 test doit(char*)

However when built as 64bit:

# g++ -m64 -O2 test.c -o test

opreport -l gives:

6513 93.7392 test ._Z4doitPc

=================

Regards,
-Maynard

Ian





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]