This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I thought that was prudent when I did my change. I had the impression that the original hppa code always expected a nonzero value. I haven't hit a circumstance where the BFD_ASSERT triggered but testing has been somewhat limited.
Cheers Nick
bfd/ChangeLog 2007-12-31 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
* elf.c (_bfd_elf_find_segment_containing_section): New function: Scan the segment map looking for the segment containing a specified function. * elf-bfd.h: Prototype the new function. * elf-hppa.h (elf_hppa_osec_to_segment): Delete. (elf_hppa_record_segment_addrs): Use new function. * elf32-bfin.c (_bfdfdpic_osec_to_segment): Use new function. * elf32-frv.c (_frvfdpic_osec_to_segment): Use new function. * elf32-hppa.c (hppa_record_segment_addr): Use new function. * elfxx-ia64.c (elfNN_ia64_relocate_section): Use new function.
Attachment:
bfd.patch.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |