This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gold vs. BFD handling of relocations

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:07:50 -0700
Subject: Re: gold vs. BFD handling of relocations
References: <20080416.234341.83044818.davem@davemloft.net> <m3ve2hue8x.fsf@google.com> <20080417.003704.164961613.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:

> It can be made generic, based upon a ->local() or ->global()
> return value, the caller can mark the reloc as "ignore" or
> something like that.

Yes, I think that is the right approach.  Something like the
Reloc_strategy we use for -r links.

Ian

References:
- gold vs. BFD handling of relocations
  - From: David Miller
- Re: gold vs. BFD handling of relocations
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gold vs. BFD handling of relocations
  - From: David Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]