This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mainline gcc vs printf args

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:13:21 +0930
Subject: Re: mainline gcc vs printf args
References: <20080730042750.GG32578@bubble.grove.modra.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807301050230.1650@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:52:19AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Alan Modra wrote:
> 
> > Current gcc mainline warns about passing a long as a printf argument
> > for a %lx format.  It wants an unsigned long instead.  I think that's
> 
> It's not meant to warn for that (even with -pedantic), and there are 
> testcases to assert the lack of such a warning.  Unless the warning is 
> only for revisions between 138207 and 138249, please file a bug report.

I was using 138226.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

References:
- mainline gcc vs printf args
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: mainline gcc vs printf args
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]