This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available)

From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:02:50 +0200
Subject: Re: binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available)
References: <20081002083849.GA15942@saumur.act-europe.fr> <48EA12B7.6080802@ubuntu.com> <48EB399A.9050206@ubuntu.com> <48EB3F5B.3040204@ubuntu.com>

On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:

Matthias Klose schrieb:
Matthias Klose schrieb:
binutils i486, amd64, oa64, powerpc, sparc: Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/ testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/ binutils/objdump 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: objdump -W Running /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/binutils/ testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ... Version /build/buildd/binutils-2.18.92.20081003/builddir-single/ binutils/readelf 2.18.92.20081003 FAIL: readelf -wa (compressed)
these did start to fail between 20080707 and 20080814.
my mistake. missing build dependency on zlib-dev


That's coherent with my tests as there are no failures on x86 nor ppc.
Good!

References:
- binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available
  - From: Matthias Klose
- binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available)
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: binutils regressions (Re: binutils-2.18.92 snapshot is available)
  - From: Matthias Klose

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]