This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Lexra support in binutils
Adam Nemet wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> writes:
> > Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Nick Clifton wrote:
> >>
> >> > In fact I would say that the only thing currently missing from your patch is a
> >> > set of ChangeLog entries for the directories affected by the changes and maybe
> >> > an entry in the gas/NEWS file mentioning the support for the Lexra.
> >>
> >> One minor nit -- it would probably make sense to put the "mips0" entry in
> >> mips_cpu_info_table[] separately before the list of "Entries for generic
> >> ISAs," with a one-line comment like: "A fake ISA for MIPS I CPUs without
> >> unaligned transfers."
> >
> > I wonder how this will play with .set mips0. Maybe we should use "mips0.9"
> > for it, "mips0.8" for the compatible octeon subset, and "mips1.9" for the
> > R5900. :-)
>
> If I understand this correctly, shouldn't octeon be mips64r1.9 then?
I had the octeon in the _other_ unaligned instruction mode in mind
with that.
Thiemo