This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH/BUGFIX] GDB needs long PE section names enabled.
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at sourceware dot org>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org, Graydon Hoare <graydon at pobox dot com>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:46:58 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH/BUGFIX] GDB needs long PE section names enabled.
- References: <49AC97EE.4060905@gmail.com> <49AD2A54.4090605@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:02:12PM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Tested that this patch works on i686-pc-cygwin both by looking at the
>> section names with objdump and by debugging a linked exe with gdb and
>> observing whether or not it reported debug info present - see attached. Now
>> running crossbuilds and regtests from i686-pc-linux-gnu to {arm-epoc-pe,
>> arm-wince-pe, i386-pc-netbsdpe, i386-pc-pe, i586-pc-interix,
>> i586-unknown-beospe, i686-pc-cygwin, i686-pc-mingw32, mcore-unknown-pe,
>> powerpcle-unknown-pe, sh-unknown-pe, thumb-epoc-pe, x86_64-pc-freebsd,
>> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-mingw32}.
>
> All passed, no regressions.
Since this is Windows related, I think I'm allowed to say: Go ahead and
check this in.
cgf