This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: broken strip/objcopy


2009/4/26 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/4/25 Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>:
>>> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Dave Korn
>>>>> ?I'm still unhappy with the architecture of the whole thing. ?It is bad
>>>>> enough for binutils to reach into bfd and twiddle its private bits, now bfd is
>>>>> predicating its behaviour on the usage patterns of one specific client,
>>>>> binutils. ?However, I see that it's not without precedent, as ld/ also does this.
>>>>
>>>> I am not happy the whole PE/COFF in BFD.
>>>
>>> ?All the more reason not to add further kludges, if we can't go forwards we
>>> should at least try to avoid getting deeper in a mess.
>>>
>>>> Sorry, I don't have time for this.
>>>
>>> ?Oh well, we'll just have to pile it on the to-do list.
>>>
>>> ? ?cheers,
>>> ? ? ?DaveK
>>>
>>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> really, I would be interested in a fix of that, as I assume Dave is
>> too. This patch breaks our current toolchain and so I would like so a
>> working patch for all PE-Coff targets, or that we revert the patch and
>> wait until it is in more common better shape.
>>
>
> Can you try:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-04/msg00364.html

Hello HJ,

yes this patch fixes it. I tested it for cygwin and mingw-w64 (multilib)

Cheers,
Kai

-- 
|  (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
| (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
| (")_(") him gain world domination


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]