This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Support LD_AS_NEEDED

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> I don't see there is a big difference here as far as gcc is
>> concerned. If we ran into any linker problems, we can always
>> ask users to provide their LD_XXXs. ?Today we have
>>
>> emultempl/elf32.em: ? ? ? ? lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
>> emultempl/elf32.em: ? ? lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_LIBRARY_PATH");
>>...
>> I don't recall any of those have caused any serious issues for
>> linker debugging.
>
> I've been bitten by LD_{RUN,LIBRARY}_PATH several times.
>

Exactly. We know how to deal with them.


-- 
H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]