This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture

From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
To: Jaka MoÄnik <jaka at xlab dot si>
Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:39:22 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
References: <1241711023.4770.70.camel@wall.xlab.lan> <1244024020.18619.18.camel@wall.xlab.lan> <9BBCEF90-00D6-4FE0-9E81-226C4DF746AF@adacore.com> <1244027407.18619.34.camel@wall.xlab.lan>

Jaka MoÄnik wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 12:56 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:

>> BTW: in there a documentation for the cpu ?
> sure there is. ;) it is unfortunately not (or, better, is not supposed
> to be) publicly available. however, asking google about it, you just
> might find something. ;)

  All of a sudden I'm uncertain whether it's suitable to include support for a
somewhat private undocumented target in FSF sources.  I don't know if there's
a policy about it but it stands out from other targets in this regard.  Do you
have any idea how many of these supercomputers there are in use out there?

    cheers,
      DaveK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
  - From: Jaka Močnik
- Re: PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- Re: PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
  - From: Jaka Močnik
- Re: PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
  - From: Jaka Močnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]