This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: objdump's ARM instruction names messed up in latest versions?

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, chris at seberino dot org
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:45:00 +0100
Subject: Re: objdump's ARM instruction names messed up in latest versions?
References: <20090616173436.GA26934@seberino.org> <20090616174504.GA17564@caradoc.them.org>

> I don't know why that involved moving the condition codes around - it
> may have been to make things more uniform.

It is. In some cases[1] the mnemonics are ambiguous depending where you put 
the condition code, so the assembly syntax was changed to consistently put the 
condition code at the end.

Paul

[1] Only FPA instructions AFAIK.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: objdump's ARM instruction names messed up in latest versions?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- objdump's ARM instruction names messed up in latest versions?
  - From: chris
- Re: objdump's ARM instruction names messed up in latest versions?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]