This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:36 AM, H.J. Lu<hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Alan Modra<amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:52:45AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Alan Modra<amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote: >>> > HJ, since your ifunc patches I can't even run "make check" on my x86 >>> > box successfully. >>> > >>> > tmpdir/dump53.o: could not read symbols: Memory exhausted >>> > FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec >>> > >>> > A quick look says it is likely to be the fact that you don't free >>> > isymbuf in check_relocs. >>> > >>> >>> I checked in this fix. >> >> Thanks, that's better. ?Reading the syms for each section processed >> was a little excessive. ?:) >> >> You might like to use bfd_sym_from_r_symndx instead of reading >> all the locals in check_relocs. ?It's a small change I made as part >> of implementing ifunc support for powerpc. >> >> If you decide to stay with reading all the locals then you probably >> ought to get rid of bfd_sym_from_r_symndx in the x86 and x86_64 >> check_relocs. > > Using bfd_sym_from_r_symndx is a good idea. I will fix x86 after > you check in your patch. > This is the patch I checked in. Thanks. -- H.J. -- 2009-06-18 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_check_relocs): Remove isymbuf and use bfd_sym_from_r_symndx. * elf64-x86-64.c (elf64_x86_64_check_relocs): Likewise.
Attachment:
bfd-sym-1.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |