This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [patch] always treat "simple obcopy of an executable" test as XFAIL on cygwin
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- To: "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:17:09 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] always treat "simple obcopy of an executable" test as XFAIL on cygwin
- References: <20090625155810.GA24704@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Just checked this in after checking with Dave Korn that it made sense.
Argh. Except that when I got round to testing it natively, it has a side
effect:
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ Running /gnu/binutils/newsrc/src/binutil
Version /gnu/binutils/newsrc/obj/binutils/nm-new 2.19.51.20090625
Running /gnu/binutils/newsrc/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp ...
Version /gnu/binutils/newsrc/obj/binutils/objcopy 2.19.51.20090625
+XPASS: objcopy (simple copy)
Running /gnu/binutils/newsrc/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ...
Version /gnu/binutils/newsrc/obj/binutils/objdump 2.19.51.20090625
Running /gnu/binutils/newsrc/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/readelf.exp ...
@@ -53,9 +54,15 @@ Running /gnu/binutils/newsrc/src/binutil
=== binutils Summary ===
-# of expected passes 92
+# of expected passes 91
+# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 1
# of unsupported tests 2
Gah. We should have patched copy_executable, not objcopy_test. CGF, have
you got time to take a second look at this?
cheers,
DaveK