This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:20:46 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
References: <4A86E723.3000602@gmail.com> <20090818191404.GB30961@gmx.de>

On 08/18/2009 09:14 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

   May I proceed in updating the tree to 2.64/1.11 before getting the rest
   of the tree (that already has out-of-sync autotools) back into sync?

As far as I'm concerned, yes. Nothing outside binutils/gdb/gcc has ever cared much about Autotools versions (and some parts like newlib/libgloss and winsup are not even CCed), it should be fine as long as we provide override.m4 to cover their bugs.

Paolo

References:
- Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]