This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:02:39 -0700
Subject: Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
References: <20090816150957.GA24096@gmx.de> <20090816151338.GB24096@gmx.de> <4A88395D.803@gnu.org> <20090818184110.GC30742@gmx.de>

Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> writes:

> The merge of toplevel synced files from GCC to src
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/42983/focus=26485>
> still doesn't have one small nod that I would like from a src maintainer:
>
> * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 06:52:45PM CEST:
>> > - the files move from GPLv2 to GPLv3 header.  Is that a problem for
>> >   anything in src?
>> 
>> I honestly don't know.

I can't see why this would be a problem, as the GNU binutils and gdb
moved to GPLv3 some time ago.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: sync toplevel between GCC and src
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]