Re: PATCH: PR ld/10536: Incorrect install-pdf/install-html

["H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini<bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
> On 08/18/2009 09:52 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>
>> * H.J. Lu wrote on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:44:50PM CEST:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * H.J. Lu wrote on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:36:23PM CEST:
>>>>
>>>> Please see this proposed patch set which will obsolete your patch:
>>>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/42947/focus=26464>
>>>> as part of the move to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11
>>>
>>> Does your patch cover libiberty?
>>
>> Yes. ?My plan is to update all that is contained in the GCC and
>> binutils plus gdb trees at once; and look at the other packages
>> that have their main home in src about what to do after that; see
>> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/42947/focus=43065>
>> for which directories exactly are in that second list.
>
> I think he meant that libiberty does not use automake. ?The libiberty patch
> looks fine, but is _not_ approved until libiberty has switched to Autoconf
> 2.64. ?Please resubmit later. ?The other parts will be obsolete.
>
> Paolo
>

Hi,

Here is the patch for libiberty.  OK for gcc and src?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.
---
libiberty/

2009-08-18  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	 PR ld/10536
	 * Makefile.in (install-html-recursive): Removed.

Attachment: binutils-install-2.patch
Description: Binary data