This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: cvs update issues with, eg., src/binutils/arlex.c
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:51:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: cvs update issues with, eg., src/binutils/arlex.c
- References: <5460e3330909030719t2c211dbfr9da16a858bee722a@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Christian,
* Christian Joensson wrote on Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:19:58PM CEST:
> I have been getting a few issues when running cvs update lately, namely these
>
> ? src/binutils/arlex.c
> ? src/binutils/arparse.c
> ? src/binutils/arparse.h
> ? src/binutils/deflex.c
> ? src/binutils/defparse.c
> ? src/binutils/defparse.h
> ? src/binutils/mcparse.c
> ? src/binutils/mcparse.h
> ? src/binutils/rcparse.c
> ? src/binutils/rcparse.h
> ? src/ld/deffilep.c
> ? src/ld/deffilep.h
> ? src/ld/ldgram.c
> ? src/ld/ldgram.h
> ? src/ld/ldlex.c
All of the above should have been fixed since
+2009-08-24 Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
+
+ * Makefile.am (am__skiplex, am__skipyacc): New.
+ * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
+
You may need to remove these files once, but after that, they should not
return, unless you build in the source tree.
> ? src/gprof/bsd_callg_bl.c
> ? src/gprof/flat_bl.c
> ? src/gprof/fsf_callg_bl.c
I never touched the rule for creating these.
> I assume these files are being generated in the source tree when
> building and not in the build tree...
Could it be possible all of these files are still leftovers from the one
time I asked you to build from src in-tree? In that case, removing them
once should fix the issue for you.
Thanks,
Ralf