This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: about register naming in cfi_parse_reg
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:25:36 +0930
- Subject: Re: about register naming in cfi_parse_reg
- References: <20090910180221.GB5884@lenovo>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:02:21PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> perhaps someone could clarify -- does cfi_parse_reg was always
> compatible with % prefix in register name? In version
> 2.19 it handles %-prefixed register without problem. Would be
That isn't true for all targets.
> there any kind of backward incompatibility if I rely on this
> feature?
If you target currently accepts '%' in this context for register
names, we would be unlikely to remove the feature in future releases.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM