This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote: > "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> writes: > >> If we don't change LDADD, we need to add $(DEPENDENCIES) to >> xxx_DEPENDENCIES. ?Otherwise, parallel build will fail since >> $(LDADD) will be used for link. ?OK to install? >> >> >> H.J. >> --- >> 2009-12-03 ?H.J. Lu ?<hongjiu.lu@intel.com> >> >> ? ? ? * Makefile.am (constructor_test_DEPENDENCIES): Add $(DEPENDENCIES). >> ? ? ? (two_file_test_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (common_test_1_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (exception_test_DEPENDENCIES) Likewise. >> ? ? ? (weak_test_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (many_sections_test_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (initpri1_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (script_test_1_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (script_test_2_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (justsyms_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (binary_test_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? (large_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise. >> ? ? ? * Makefile.in: Regenerated. > > This is not the right fix. ?These tests should not be linked against > the libraries listed in LDADD. ?It may be that we should avoid using > LDADD at all. > Here is a patch to define empty xxx_LDADD. OK to install? -- H.J.
Attachment:
gold-foo-2.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |