This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: m68k no longer supported?

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
To: Josef Wolf <jw at raven dot inka dot de>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:38:43 +0100
Subject: Re: m68k no longer supported?
References: <20100205182248.GE28667@raven.wolf.lan> <20100205183653.GA21701@caradoc.them.org> <20100205184914.GA22398@raven.wolf.lan> <20100205190528.GA24047@caradoc.them.org> <20100206100623.GB22398@raven.wolf.lan>

Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de> writes:

> But I am still somewhat confused. Is it the m68k-ieee target that is no longer
> supported or is it the --additional-targets option that causes the problems?

m68k-ieee was never a valid target, since ieee is not a recognized OS.
Due to wildcard matching unrecognized target triplets are not always
diagnosed.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf

References:
- m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]