This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ignoring some undefined symbols


That's too bad, we really liked this feature when building librairies
for runtime loading (like Apache modules for instance).
Would you guys be interested in a patch that implements this feature in LD?

Mathieu

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> Mathieu Ropert <sagara@puchiko.net> writes:
>
>> I'm currently porting an application from Tru64 / OSF to Linux and I'm
>> looking for a feature I had with Tru64's LD that I can't find in
>> binutils.
>> When building a shared library, I want LD to report undefined symbols
>> in object files BUT I need to ignore some undefined symbols.
>> On Tru64, there's the -expect_unresolved flag that takes a symbol name
>> pattern (like shell filename expansion) and ignore them when reporting
>> undefined symbols.
>> With binutils' LD, I use the --no-undefined to have undefined symbols
>> checked when building shared libraries, but I still need to make it
>> ignore some undefined references (full names or patterns, both can
>> do).
>> Is there any way to do it?
>
> As far as I know the GNU linker has no such feature. ?Sorry.
>
> Ian
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]