This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()

From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: iant at google dot com
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:10:31 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
References: <mcraav0djrc.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <20100223.143829.114981220.davem@davemloft.net> <mcrwry3a1c3.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:07:08 -0800

> That is interesting.  Is there a linker script involved?  When there
> is no linker script, I have not yet seen any cases where gold is
> slower than GNU ld.

No linker script.

I assume you are testing exclusively on sparc like I am ;-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: Rafael Espindola

References:
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: David Miller
- Re: overhead of bfd_{get,put}*()
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]