This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Reduce ARM linking time


We encountered an problem with ARM ld that the linking time of a large application was very long, about 1.5 hour.

The root cause of this issue is ARM uses a double link list to track sections with ARM specific section data allocated. Below is the related comment:

/* Unfortunately we need to keep a list of sections for which
   an _arm_elf_section_data structure has been allocated.  This
   is because it is possible for functions like elf32_arm_write_section
   to be called on a section which has had an elf_data_structure
   allocated for it (and so the used_by_bfd field is valid) but
   for which the ARM extended version of this structure - the
   _arm_elf_section_data structure - has not been allocated.  */

When ARM specific section data for a particular section is needed, the *whole* list is traversed to verify if that section is in the list, i.e. it has ARM specific section data allocated. For large applications with tens of thousands of sections, the traverse time becomes extremely long. This was used to fix:

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1147

This patch uses is_arm_elf, as Paul and Dan suggested, to decide if this section has an _arm_elf_section_data. We also need to set mapcount to -1 in elf32_arm_write_section to distinguish the two cases: no mapping symbols (mapcount == 0) vs mapping symbols have been consumed (mapcount == 1). Otherwise, the bug mentioned in

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-02/msg00018.html

would come out and bite us again.

Ld regression testing with arm-none-linux-gnueabi is OK.

OK to commit?

--
Jie Zhang
CodeSourcery
(650) 331-3385 x735
2010-03-19  Jie Zhang  <jie@codesourcery.com>

	* elf32-arm.c (struct section_list): Remove.
	(section_list): Remove typedef.
	(record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data): Remove.
	(find_arm_elf_section_entry): Remove.
	(get_arm_elf_section_data): Use is_arm_elf.
	(unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data): Remove.
	(elf32_arm_new_section_hook): Don't call
	record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data.
	(elf32_arm_write_section): Set mapcount to -1 when
	the map has been used. Don't call
	unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data.
	(unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections): Remove.
	(elf32_arm_close_and_cleanup): Remove.
	(elf32_arm_bfd_free_cached_info): Remove.
	(bfd_elf32_close_and_cleanup): Don't define.
	(bfd_elf32_bfd_free_cached_info): Don't define.


Index: elf32-arm.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.227
diff -u -p -r1.227 elf32-arm.c
--- elf32-arm.c	4 Mar 2010 17:16:08 -0000	1.227
+++ elf32-arm.c	16 Mar 2010 05:18:53 -0000
@@ -12786,108 +12786,15 @@ elf32_arm_section_from_shdr (bfd *abfd,
   return TRUE;
 }
 
-/* A structure used to record a list of sections, independently
-   of the next and prev fields in the asection structure.  */
-typedef struct section_list
-{
-  asection * sec;
-  struct section_list * next;
-  struct section_list * prev;
-}
-section_list;
-
-/* Unfortunately we need to keep a list of sections for which
-   an _arm_elf_section_data structure has been allocated.  This
-   is because it is possible for functions like elf32_arm_write_section
-   to be called on a section which has had an elf_data_structure
-   allocated for it (and so the used_by_bfd field is valid) but
-   for which the ARM extended version of this structure - the
-   _arm_elf_section_data structure - has not been allocated.  */
-static section_list * sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = NULL;
-
-static void
-record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec)
-{
-  struct section_list * entry;
-
-  entry = (struct section_list *) bfd_malloc (sizeof (* entry));
-  if (entry == NULL)
-    return;
-  entry->sec = sec;
-  entry->next = sections_with_arm_elf_section_data;
-  entry->prev = NULL;
-  if (entry->next != NULL)
-    entry->next->prev = entry;
-  sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = entry;
-}
-
-static struct section_list *
-find_arm_elf_section_entry (asection * sec)
-{
-  struct section_list * entry;
-  static struct section_list * last_entry = NULL;
-
-  /* This is a short cut for the typical case where the sections are added
-     to the sections_with_arm_elf_section_data list in forward order and
-     then looked up here in backwards order.  This makes a real difference
-     to the ld-srec/sec64k.exp linker test.  */
-  entry = sections_with_arm_elf_section_data;
-  if (last_entry != NULL)
-    {
-      if (last_entry->sec == sec)
-	entry = last_entry;
-      else if (last_entry->next != NULL
-	       && last_entry->next->sec == sec)
-	entry = last_entry->next;
-    }
-
-  for (; entry; entry = entry->next)
-    if (entry->sec == sec)
-      break;
-
-  if (entry)
-    /* Record the entry prior to this one - it is the entry we are most
-       likely to want to locate next time.  Also this way if we have been
-       called from unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data() we will not
-       be caching a pointer that is about to be freed.  */
-    last_entry = entry->prev;
-
-  return entry;
-}
-
 static _arm_elf_section_data *
 get_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec)
 {
-  struct section_list * entry;
-
-  entry = find_arm_elf_section_entry (sec);
-
-  if (entry)
-    return elf32_arm_section_data (entry->sec);
+  if (sec && sec->owner && is_arm_elf (sec->owner))
+    return elf32_arm_section_data (sec);
   else
     return NULL;
 }
 
-static void
-unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (asection * sec)
-{
-  struct section_list * entry;
-
-  entry = find_arm_elf_section_entry (sec);
-
-  if (entry)
-    {
-      if (entry->prev != NULL)
-	entry->prev->next = entry->next;
-      if (entry->next != NULL)
-	entry->next->prev = entry->prev;
-      if (entry == sections_with_arm_elf_section_data)
-	sections_with_arm_elf_section_data = entry->next;
-      free (entry);
-    }
-}
-
-
 typedef struct
 {
   void *finfo;
@@ -13312,8 +13219,6 @@ elf32_arm_new_section_hook (bfd *abfd, a
       sec->used_by_bfd = sdata;
     }
 
-  record_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec);
-
   return _bfd_elf_new_section_hook (abfd, sec);
 }
 
@@ -13744,44 +13649,13 @@ elf32_arm_write_section (bfd *output_bfd
     }
 
   free (map);
-  arm_data->mapcount = 0;
+  arm_data->mapcount = -1;
   arm_data->mapsize = 0;
   arm_data->map = NULL;
-  unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec);
 
   return FALSE;
 }
 
-static void
-unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections (bfd * abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
-					asection * sec,
-					void * ignore ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
-{
-  unrecord_section_with_arm_elf_section_data (sec);
-}
-
-static bfd_boolean
-elf32_arm_close_and_cleanup (bfd * abfd)
-{
-  if (abfd->sections)
-    bfd_map_over_sections (abfd,
-			   unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections,
-			   NULL);
-
-  return _bfd_elf_close_and_cleanup (abfd);
-}
-
-static bfd_boolean
-elf32_arm_bfd_free_cached_info (bfd * abfd)
-{
-  if (abfd->sections)
-    bfd_map_over_sections (abfd,
-			   unrecord_section_via_map_over_sections,
-			   NULL);
-
-  return _bfd_free_cached_info (abfd);
-}
-
 /* Display STT_ARM_TFUNC symbols as functions.  */
 
 static void
@@ -13968,8 +13842,6 @@ const struct elf_size_info elf32_arm_siz
 #define bfd_elf32_find_inliner_info	        elf32_arm_find_inliner_info
 #define bfd_elf32_new_section_hook		elf32_arm_new_section_hook
 #define bfd_elf32_bfd_is_target_special_symbol	elf32_arm_is_target_special_symbol
-#define bfd_elf32_close_and_cleanup             elf32_arm_close_and_cleanup
-#define bfd_elf32_bfd_free_cached_info          elf32_arm_bfd_free_cached_info
 #define bfd_elf32_bfd_final_link		elf32_arm_final_link
 
 #define elf_backend_get_symbol_type             elf32_arm_get_symbol_type

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]