This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 03:14:53 Ludovic CourtÃs wrote: > Adding -L/path/to/libc, or LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/libc, or adding > /path/to/libc to the RUNPATH of libc.so.0* doesnât solve the problem > (libhurduser and libmachuser are in the same directory as libc.so.) are you not using sysroots ? > So, is ld supposed to honor RUNPATH from libc.so.0*, given that this > shared library is only referenced from a âGROUPâ command in libc.so? > What are the search paths used for dependencies of shared libraries > mentioned in a âGROUPâ command? i dont think so. if you didnt want to use sysroots for some weird reason, an alternative might be to use the full path in the linker script. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |