This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch][gold] Fix R_ARM_TLS_LE32 when there is no TLS segment

From: Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>
To: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Cc: Doug Kwan (éæå) <dougkwan at google dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 02:49:07 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch][gold] Fix R_ARM_TLS_LE32 when there is no TLS segment
References: <AANLkTilnRgyNamFlzltj0_Ez5FUQcJ52Qj-DSqWFWv80@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikArcIoUqBVE343cexQw-jAvfus9VykaIs82Aym@mail.gmail.com>

And yet another small fix. I had the order of the sections swapped
when computing the offset. That worked most of the time because
usually there are one or two sections and I also had a ">" instead of
a "<" :-(

I have also attached a diff from the previous file to make it clear
what has changed.

Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola

Attachment: gold-tls.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: diff.patch
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch][gold] Fix R_ARM_TLS_LE32 when there is no TLS segment
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=

References:
- [patch][gold] Fix R_ARM_TLS_LE32 when there is no TLS segment
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [patch][gold] Fix R_ARM_TLS_LE32 when there is no TLS segment
  - From: Rafael Espindola

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]