This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: version scripts and default/C language mangling


On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Monday, July 12, 2010 04:05:02 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger writes:
>> > first, i'm asking what the default language is for the version script.
>> > i'd expect the answer to be "no language" which means the symbols would
>> > be matched against any random leading char a target introduces. ?i'm
>> > also OK with the answer "C language", although it does prevent working
>> > with symbols that lack the prefix char because they were created via
>> > assembly code.
>>
>> The default language is "C". ?I think the right thing to do in that case
>> is strip the leading character if present, and otherwise do nothing.
>> That is what bfd_demangle does.
>
> works for me
>
>> > yes, but presumably changing ldlang.c to consider that value is
>> > unacceptable. the current parsing code is also not given the current
>> > bfd, only bfd_elf_version_expr structures, and those dont contain links
>> > back to a bfd that i can see. ?unless there is a way to get the current
>> > "active" bfd ? ?then it should be easy to drop in support in
>> > lang_vers_match() with the function bfd_get_symbol_leading_char() you
>> > pointed out.
>>
>> I think it would be entirely reasonable to change lang_vers_match to
>> take a BFD parameter, and change the corresponding calling code in
>> bfd/elflink.c. ?Or, the output BFD is always available in
>> link_info.output_bfd.
>
> since the existing bfd_demangle user in this file is using
> link_info.output_bfd, i'm going to roll with that.
>
> how does the attached patch look ? ?seems to fix things with Blackfin targets,
> and no regressions are seen with x86_64-linux-gnu and bfin-linux-uclibc.
>
> i'll do some more system wide testing in the mean time ...

Hi Mike,

Did this patch pass your testing?

I would be interested in trying it out but it would appear that the
patch you sent has been mangled by Exchange (= characters everywhere).

Cheers,


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]