This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix binutils/gold build on NetBSD

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:23:59 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix binutils/gold build on NetBSD
References: <1291438024-7921-1-git-send-email-lacombar@gmail.com> <mcrbp4yv5yc.fsf@google.com> <AANLkTi=26FMqjRMWGO=h2uq6pcnZTx+BpNPfTh2WMsnB@mail.gmail.com>

Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> writes:

> In the mean time, shouldn't this kind of portability call go to libiberty ?

I would personally only be inclined to put it in libiberty if it were a
proper reimplementation of mremap.  Since gold does not require a proper
reimplementation, the gold-specific version seems appropriate to me.
Also there's a good chance to no other program which uses libiberty will
want to use mremap, which is another reason to keep it in gold.

Ian

References:
- [PATCH] Fix binutils/gold build on NetBSD
  - From: Arnaud Lacombe
- Re: [PATCH] Fix binutils/gold build on NetBSD
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [PATCH] Fix binutils/gold build on NetBSD
  - From: Arnaud Lacombe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]