This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Request to back port a patch to 2.21 branch

From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
To: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
Cc: Sebastian Huber <sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:58:18 -0600
Subject: Re: Request to back port a patch to 2.21 branch
References: <4D08DE41.3090900@embedded-brains.de> <380E3956-212C-435E-9C22-5825299D3236@adacore.com>

On 12/15/2010 09:43 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:

On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
Alan Modra was so kind to provide a patch (attached file) that fixes the
problem described here:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2010-11/msg00485.html
Is it possible to apply this patch also to the 2.21 branch?  We want to use the
Binutils 2.21 for the current RTEMS tool chain and this is the only open issue
remaining.
Done.

According to the email thread, Alan's patch caused one
test to regress.  Was that resolved in the final patch
version?

--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request to back port a patch to 2.21 branch
  - From: Sebastian Huber

References:
- Request to back port a patch to 2.21 branch
  - From: Sebastian Huber
- Re: Request to back port a patch to 2.21 branch
  - From: Tristan Gingold

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]