Re: Request to back port a patch to 2.21 branch

[Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>]

On 12/15/2010 10:05 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> > On 12/15/2010 04:58 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > On 12/15/2010 09:43 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > > > On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Alan Modra was so kind to provide a patch (attached file) that fixes the
> > > > > problem described here:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2010-11/msg00485.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to apply this patch also to the 2.21 branch?  We want
> > > > > to use the
> > > > > Binutils 2.21 for the current RTEMS tool chain and this is the only
> > > > > open issue
> > > > > remaining.
> > > > Done.
> > > According to the email thread, Alan's patch caused one
> > > test to regress.  Was that resolved in the final patch
> > > version?
> > My patch cause a regression.  I am not aware that Alan's patch caused one.
> Yes, that's my understanding too.
Great!  Just double checking. :)

--joel