This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] AMD bdver2 processors 2/2 - TBM
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Quentin Neill <quentin dot neill dot gnu at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:00:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD bdver2 processors 2/2 - TBM
- References: <AANLkTinLFRoQ+ZY7+=Y6AZS_4HTEAX7Y10x0QxX=xJzE@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinwBnVRw_USGb8ttyWNQmSn_DpgDd5NzH4e8sDQ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimDYD0Qcu238zsBRP5+G4Fe6Ldn47JD_qEwBczx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinmVq_X2xQrPd7126xAZX70iQb5PHivB6kL9fsc@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Quentin Neill
<quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:03 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:56 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Quentin Neill
>>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> These two patches add support for BMI and TBM ISAs to be introduced in
>>>> AMD bdver2 processors.
>>>>
>>>> The full encoding specification is delayed, however I have posted
>>>> abbreviated specs on the gcc mailing list:
>>>> BMI: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01766.html
>>>> TBM: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01767.html
>>>>
>>>> Tested on x86-64 with "make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=i386.exp".
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why is "bextr" in both BMI and TBM? ?Please double check you don't have
>>> instructions in both BMI and TBM.
>>>
>>
>> I see. The TBM one takes an immediate operand.
>>
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
>
> Refreshed with updated Changelogs.
>
> Tested on x86-64 with "make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=i386.exp".
>
> Okay to commit?
Didn't you submit a patch with both BMI and TBM?
--
H.J.