This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Octoploid <cryptooctoploid at gmail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:32:45 -0800
Subject: Re: binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc
References: <AANLkTi==jMF+p7jz5aggY=8yG6bZp4SftPfro1hG72U4@mail.gmail.com> <20110111234855.GD11694@bubble.grove.modra.org> <AANLkTikQ0R+GkwtLm7JpEp3KCaAodLtT_ap_gjGTZRD=@mail.gmail.com> <20110112023008.GE11694@bubble.grove.modra.org> <AANLkTikH_NP_+1FTe-4NQVikD49UoJzm3_NLzRySasob@mail.gmail.com>

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> Not exactly, it segfault at build-time.  If you want to use the latest
> binutils to BUILD your glibc, I think it is OK to require you to patch
> your glibc. I can provide a patch for glibc 2.12.

That doesn't really sound OK to me....

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc
  - From: Octoploid
- Re: binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: binutils > 2.21.51.0.2 fails to build glibc
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]