This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix objdump output of R_SPARC_OLO10

From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: hp at bitrange dot com
Cc: amodra at gmail dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org, richm at oldelvet dot org dot uk
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix objdump output of R_SPARC_OLO10
References: <20110120.235011.163250246.davem@davemloft.net> <20110121085649.GK11694@bubble.grove.modra.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101210414390.17056@dair.pair.com>

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:19:01 -0500 (EST)

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:50:11PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> > 466 lines of code deleted from the tree as a result.
>>
>> And a 20% blowout in reloc size.  I can't say I like that.  Well, to
>> be fair, this really only matters in the linker and not all backend
>> linkers use arelent to handle relocs.  Still, many do, even some ELF
>> linkers.
> 
> Solvable by selecting it with a want_arelent2 like the want64 in
> config.bfd for 64-bit bfd_vma?

That is one possible way to handle this.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix objdump output of R_SPARC_OLO10
  - From: David Miller

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix objdump output of R_SPARC_OLO10
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Fix objdump output of R_SPARC_OLO10
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [PATCH] Fix objdump output of R_SPARC_OLO10
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]