This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Mention symbol name in non-constant .size expression

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
Cc: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, hp at axis dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:24:57 +1030
Subject: Re: PATCH: Mention symbol name in non-constant .size expression
References: <AANLkTik8iLbOA9=EU-mnPn+7ZvCco+x4sdwGwRAY-pqQ@mail.gmail.com> <201103070328.p273S2rm023864@ignucius.se.axis.com>

On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:28:02AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> If there's no intention to actually fix it, I think xfail is
> more appropriate; no particular reason it should fail, IMHO.

The new test will fail for any target without DIFF_EXPR_OK defined.
HJ, I don't think it is worth going to the bother of firstly finding
out exactly what set of targets that is, then xfailing them all.
Please just revert the testsuite change that checks for the symbol
name.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Mention symbol name in non-constant .size expression
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- Re: PATCH: Mention symbol name in non-constant .size expression
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Mention symbol name in non-constant .size expression
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]