This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] add bdver2 processor.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Quentin Neill
<quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:40 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Quentin Neill
>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:45 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Quentin Neill
>>>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds the bdver2 processor flag. ?It passes make check on x86-64.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay to commit?
>>>>> --
>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> gas/
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* config/tc-i386.c (cpu_arch): Add bdver2.
>>>>> ? ? ? ?(i386_align_code): Add PROCESSOR_BDVER2 cases.
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* config/tc-i386.h (processor_type): Add PROCESSOR_BDVER2.
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* doc/c-i386.texi: Add bdver2.
>>>>>
>>>>> opcodes/
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* i386-gen.c (cpu_flag_init): Add new CPU_BDVER2_FLAGS.
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* i386-init.h: Regenerated.
>>>>>
>>>>> gas/testsuite/
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/i386.exp: Add new bdver2 test cases.
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/nops-1-bdver2.d: New.
>>>>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/x86-64-nops-1-bdver2.d: New.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you nreally nned PROCESSOR_BDVER2? Can you use PROCESSOR_BDVER1? instead?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> H.J.
>>>>
>>>
>>> BDVER2 adds BMI and TBM.
>>
>> That is controlled by CPU_BDVER2_FLAGS.
>>
>
> [ Sorry for the delay, ?I was out for a couple of days. ?Re-adding
> binutils@sourceware.org (I meant to copy on my 2nd reply). ]
>
> So without PROCESSOR_BDVER2, that means no -march=bdver2 flag support,
> but what else?
>
Can you replace PROCESSOR_BDVER2 with PROCESSOR_BDVER1
to see if it makes a difference?
--
H.J.