This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd_link_hash_traverse

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:47:54 -0700
Subject: Re: bfd_link_hash_traverse
References: <20110613005946.GA22863@bubble.grove.modra.org> <mcrmxhltq4y.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <20110614010730.GC22863@bubble.grove.modra.org>

Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> writes:

> I also don't see how we could create two levels of warning symbols
> with current code, given that warning symbols have the same name as
> the real symbol they point to.  See linker.c:link_action table
> current/prev both WARN gives NOACT.

Hmmm, you're right, I guess I am misremembering.  I guess we don't
handle multiple warnings on the same symbol.

Ian

References:
- bfd_link_hash_traverse
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: bfd_link_hash_traverse
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: bfd_link_hash_traverse
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]