This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Release 2.22: Next week ...
On Nov 18, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Doug Kwan (éæå) wrote:
> Tristan,
>
> If you don't mind, can I also backport these gold's ARM fixes for test
> regression?
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00047.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00041.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00043.html
Done.
>
> -Doug
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
>>
>>> On 17/11/11 14:50, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I plan to make the 2.22 release next week.
>>>>> There are still a few pending back ports: micromips and 'V2 of get symbol linker plugin interface' come to my mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual, speak up if you think I missed something.
>>>>
>>>> I have run the testsuite for most of the targets. I think there aren't blocking regressions for a 22.0, although I think it would be nice to clean-up arm-eabi and mips*-* for the 22.1
>>>
>>>> arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Long
>>>> arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 1
>>>> arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 2
>>>
>>> I thought I had fixed these with:
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-11/msg00072.html
>>>
>>> Which was committed:
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00042.html
>>>
>>> When I run the tests myself targetting arm-none-eabi they pass, as they also (I am assuming) in your arm-linux-gnueabi run (you didn't highlight them there).
>>
>> Yes, I was surprised too.
>>
>>> Do you mind sending me the appropriate part of ld.log from the testrun and I will try to see if I can reproduce the failure?
>>
>> Sure:
>>
>> /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../gas/as-new -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o -march=armv7-a -mthumb /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers.s
>> Executing on host: sh -c {/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../gas/as-new -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o -march=armv7-a -mthumb /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers.s 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
>> /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1 -L/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm --no-fix-arm1176 --section-start destsect=0x00009000 --section-start .text=0x8000 tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o
>> Executing on host: sh -c {/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1 -L/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm --no-fix-arm1176 --section-start destsect=0x00009000 --section-start .text=0x8000 tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
>> Executing on host: sh -c {/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../binutils/objdump -d tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1 >dump.out 2>ld.stderr} /dev/null (timeout = 300)
>> /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../binutils/objdump -d tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1
>> regexp_diff match failure
>> regexp "^ 9000: e7fe b.n 9000 <dest>$"
>> line " 9000: f7ff bffe b.w 9000 <dest>"
>> FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 1
>>
>> Tell me if you need more.
>>
>> Tristan.
>>
>>