This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Release 2.22: Next week ... (m68hc11 testsuite)
- From: James Murray <jsm at jsm-net dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 23:04:36 +0000
- Subject: Re: Release 2.22: Next week ... (m68hc11 testsuite)
- References: <ADFB3A72-FDFA-4402-A6D5-CADEA94D0ED2@adacore.com> <1324230304.8652.3.camel@jsm2> <81013813-59AA-4061-8C6C-727D10F02149@adacore.com> <1324323896.8652.34.camel@jsm2> <1324389068.8652.70.camel@jsm2> <6273DF63-6E89-4A92-9FEF-52CFFE3E22C6@adacore.com> <1324392565.8652.73.camel@jsm2> <1325173546.2430.127.camel@jsm2> <1325211174.2430.145.camel@jsm2>
Another m68hc11 testsuite question.
The one remaining testsuite fail I see looks like it might be related to
"PR 6848"
When built for target m6811, the following gas test fails:
(It is skipped for the normal target name m68hc11.)
---------------------------------
../as-new -o
dump.o /usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s
Executing on host: sh -c {../as-new -o
dump.o /usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s
2>&1} /dev/null gas.out (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
/usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s:
Assembler messages:
/usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s:4:
Error: redefined symbol cannot be used on reloc
/usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s:
Assembler messages:
/usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s:4:
Error: redefined symbol cannot be used on reloc
/usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/binout/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -t dump.o
Executing on host: sh -c
{/usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/binout/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -t dump.o >dump.out 2>gas.stderr} /dev/null (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
/usr/src/jsm/binutils-cvs/test/binout/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump: 'dump.o': No such file
FAIL: .equ redefinitions (ELF)
---------------------------------
Is this an expected failure or does it indicate a problem with the
target that needs fixing?
I'm hoping to have a revised 9s12x/xgate patch ready soon, Sean Keys has
been peer-reviewing the output and giving feedback. I've added the
missing opcodes he identified, cleaned up some other issues, added new
tests and believe I've resolved the trampoline generation problem too.
regards
James Murray