This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 2.22.1 Possible -> Yes!

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>, Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:10:51 -0400
Subject: Re: 2.22.1 Possible -> Yes!
References: <4F97F997.9000702@oarcorp.com> <20120427034101.GK3258@bubble.grove.modra.org> <201204270007.17541.vapier@gentoo.org>

On Friday 27 April 2012 00:07:15 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 26 April 2012 23:41:01 Alan Modra wrote:
> > Even distros use trunk snapshots as their base
> > for binutils, eg. RHEL6.3 is based on binutils-2.20.51.0.2.
> 
> Gentoo used to but found them too unstable.  so once the GNU releases
> started picking up, we stopped relying on his snapshots.

btw, i'm not suggesting it's hjlu's fault for his snapshots being unstable.  
he adds some custom tweaks (which every once in a while cause a problem), but 
by and large, the instability is from the snapshotting of trunk.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- 2.22.1 Possible
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: 2.22.1 Possible -> Yes!
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: 2.22.1 Possible -> Yes!
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]