This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Possible bug in m68k-rtems

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: John Darrington <john at darrington dot wattle dot id dot au>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:28:49 +0930
Subject: Re: Possible bug in m68k-rtems
References: <20120701080150.GA24742@cellform.com> <20120701135117.GA25209@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20120701141547.GA26200@cellform.com>

On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:15:47PM +0000, John Darrington wrote:
> In that case, the bug must be in the second example I posted, which does not show this
> correct behaviour?

Exactly.  Current ld doesn't behave as per your second example, so I
assumed your were using some old version of ld in that case.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible bug in m68k-rtems
  - From: John Darrington

References:
- Possible bug in m68k-rtems
  - From: John Darrington
- Re: Possible bug in m68k-rtems
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Possible bug in m68k-rtems
  - From: John Darrington

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]