This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 13:17:53 Yufeng Zhang wrote: > It has been pointed out that the use of the C99 macros PRIi64 and PRIx64 > (in opcodes/aarch64-opc.c) may cause the build to fail in an environment > where there is lack of C99 support. > > I am considering to eliminate the dependency on this C99 feature by > replacing PRIi64 and PRIx64 with some alternative approach in the > AArch64 port. Before doing that, I wonder what the general policy is > about coding the binutils using C99 features. Interestingly, I didn't > find any other port includes the inttypes.h header file (not to say the > use of PRIi64 and PRIx64). we use them in gdb and the sim, although we have gnulib available in the gdb subdir. in general though, i don't see a problem using inttypes.h since glibc has had the header since 1997. wait to see if someone complains. also, isn't stdint.h and the uint32_t/etc... types technically C99 ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |